Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: BUG #2204: Feature Req: Unique output column names

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
Cc: Brandon Black <blblack(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: BUG #2204: Feature Req: Unique output column names
Date: 2006-01-24 16:44:03
Message-ID: 19737.1138121043@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> writes:
> It would be nice to have this text in HTML or info format.  This PDF
> mess is really awkward.

Yeah, that's why I tend to look at SQL92 or SQL99 first ... I have those
drafts in plain-ASCII format, which is so much easier to grep and copy.
Would love to lay my hands on plain-ASCII SQL2003.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-bugs by date

Next:From: Jean-Pierre PelletierDate: 2006-01-24 16:56:45
Subject: Re: BUG #2178: NOT IN command don't work
Previous:From: Alvaro HerreraDate: 2006-01-24 16:39:21
Subject: Re: BUG #2204: Feature Req: Unique output column names

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group