Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: updated patch for selecting large results sets in psql using cursors

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, chrisnospam(at)1006(dot)org
Subject: Re: updated patch for selecting large results sets in psql using cursors
Date: 2006-08-28 23:06:38
Message-ID: 19725.1156806398@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-patches
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> Tom Lane wrote:
>>> Wait a minute.  What I thought we had agreed to was a patch to make
>>> commands sent with \g use a cursor.

> I am confused.  I assume \g and ; should be affected, like Peter says. 
> Tom, what *every* command are you talking about?  You mean \d?

Like I said, I thought we were intending to modify \g's behavior only;
that was certainly the implication of the discussion of "\gc".

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2006-08-28 23:08:07
Subject: Re: updated patch for selecting large results sets
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2006-08-28 22:54:13
Subject: Re: updated patch for selecting large results sets

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2006-08-28 23:08:07
Subject: Re: updated patch for selecting large results sets
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2006-08-28 22:54:13
Subject: Re: updated patch for selecting large results sets

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group