Re: Bug in SQL function with returntype void

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Zíka Aleš, Ing(dot)" <Ales(dot)Zika(at)pel(dot)br(dot)ds(dot)mfcr(dot)cz>
Cc: pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Bug in SQL function with returntype void
Date: 2003-06-12 17:30:58
Message-ID: 19595.1055439058@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

=?iso-8859-2?Q?=22Z=EDka_Ale=B9=2C_Ing=2E=22?= <Ales(dot)Zika(at)pel(dot)br(dot)ds(dot)mfcr(dot)cz> writes:
> I tried the example "CREATE FUNCTION clean_EMP () RETURNS void AS
> 'DELETE FROM EMP WHERE EMP.salary <= 0' LANGUAGE SQL;" in chapter 9.2.1 of
> Programmer's guide.
> When the function was invoked, it delete only one tuple, although
> there were more tuples satisfying the WHERE condition. During secont
> invocation it deleted next tuple and so on.

Good catch. I've applied the attached patch.

regards, tom lane

*** src/backend/executor/functions.c.orig Wed Sep 4 16:31:18 2002
--- src/backend/executor/functions.c Thu Jun 12 13:26:12 2003
***************
*** 273,289 ****

if (es->qd->operation == CMD_UTILITY)
{
- /*
- * Process a utility command. (create, destroy...) DZ - 30-8-1996
- */
ProcessUtility(es->qd->parsetree->utilityStmt, es->qd->dest, NULL);
- if (!LAST_POSTQUEL_COMMAND(es))
- CommandCounterIncrement();
return (TupleTableSlot *) NULL;
}

! /* If it's not the last command, just run it to completion */
! count = (LAST_POSTQUEL_COMMAND(es)) ? 1L : 0L;

return ExecutorRun(es->qd, es->estate, ForwardScanDirection, count);
}
--- 273,291 ----

if (es->qd->operation == CMD_UTILITY)
{
ProcessUtility(es->qd->parsetree->utilityStmt, es->qd->dest, NULL);
return (TupleTableSlot *) NULL;
}

! /*
! * If it's the function's last command, and it's a SELECT, fetch one
! * row at a time so we can return the results. Otherwise just run it
! * to completion.
! */
! if (LAST_POSTQUEL_COMMAND(es) && es->qd->operation == CMD_SELECT)
! count = 1L;
! else
! count = 0L;

return ExecutorRun(es->qd, es->estate, ForwardScanDirection, count);
}

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2003-06-12 17:33:28 Re: Bug in SQL function with returntype void
Previous Message Dmitry Tkach 2003-06-12 16:49:05 Re: pg_dumpall not working in batch