From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Patrick Welche <prlw1(at)newn(dot)cam(dot)ac(dot)uk> |
Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-ports(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Geometry test on NetBSD (was Re: [HACKERS] RC1?) |
Date: | 2002-11-20 18:21:47 |
Message-ID: | 19590.1037816507@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-ports |
Patrick Welche <prlw1(at)newn(dot)cam(dot)ac(dot)uk> writes:
> Right, the equivalent for NetBSD vfprintf.c is:
> revision 1.40
> date: 2001/11/28 11:58:22; author: kleink; state: Exp; lines: +4 -4
> Since we're returned the sign of a floating-point number by __dtoa(),
> use that to decide whether to include a minus sign in the result.
> Fixes printing -0.0, and thus PR lib/3137.
> NetBSD 1.5 has revision 1.32, NetBSD 1.6 has revision 1.42
Ah-hah, so it is a version issue --- we could make the resultmap line
something like
geometry/.*-netbsd1.[0-5]=geometry-positive-zeros
Would you confirm what config.guess prints on your box --- in
particular, is there a dot in the version number?
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2002-11-20 18:23:34 | Re: Geometry test on NetBSD (was Re: [HACKERS] RC1?) |
Previous Message | Patrick Welche | 2002-11-20 17:57:53 | Re: Geometry test on NetBSD (was Re: [HACKERS] RC1?) |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2002-11-20 18:23:34 | Re: Geometry test on NetBSD (was Re: [HACKERS] RC1?) |
Previous Message | Patrick Welche | 2002-11-20 17:57:53 | Re: Geometry test on NetBSD (was Re: [HACKERS] RC1?) |