Re: Geometry test on NetBSD (was Re: [HACKERS] RC1?)

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Patrick Welche <prlw1(at)newn(dot)cam(dot)ac(dot)uk>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-ports(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Geometry test on NetBSD (was Re: [HACKERS] RC1?)
Date: 2002-11-20 18:21:47
Message-ID: 19590.1037816507@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-ports

Patrick Welche <prlw1(at)newn(dot)cam(dot)ac(dot)uk> writes:
> Right, the equivalent for NetBSD vfprintf.c is:
> revision 1.40
> date: 2001/11/28 11:58:22; author: kleink; state: Exp; lines: +4 -4
> Since we're returned the sign of a floating-point number by __dtoa(),
> use that to decide whether to include a minus sign in the result.
> Fixes printing -0.0, and thus PR lib/3137.

> NetBSD 1.5 has revision 1.32, NetBSD 1.6 has revision 1.42

Ah-hah, so it is a version issue --- we could make the resultmap line
something like
geometry/.*-netbsd1.[0-5]=geometry-positive-zeros

Would you confirm what config.guess prints on your box --- in
particular, is there a dot in the version number?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2002-11-20 18:23:34 Re: Geometry test on NetBSD (was Re: [HACKERS] RC1?)
Previous Message Patrick Welche 2002-11-20 17:57:53 Re: Geometry test on NetBSD (was Re: [HACKERS] RC1?)

Browse pgsql-ports by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2002-11-20 18:23:34 Re: Geometry test on NetBSD (was Re: [HACKERS] RC1?)
Previous Message Patrick Welche 2002-11-20 17:57:53 Re: Geometry test on NetBSD (was Re: [HACKERS] RC1?)