Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: 7.5 release notes

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl>
Cc: Gaetano Mendola <mendola(at)bigfoot(dot)com>,Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: 7.5 release notes
Date: 2004-07-26 06:17:10
Message-ID: 19574.1090822630@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docspgsql-hackers
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl> writes:
> On Mon, Jul 26, 2004 at 02:22:21AM +0200, Gaetano Mendola wrote:
>> In the release not I can read:
>> This allows columns to contain arbitrary composite types
>> like rows from other tables. [SNIPPED]
>> 
>> Wasn't this alread true on 7.4 ?

> No, this is a new feature.  Did you try inserting anything into the
> tables?

Postgres has always accepted this syntax, but it has not done anything
useful in many years, and when it last did do something useful the
semantics were quite a bit different :-(

Elein has standing to bash me about the change of semantics, but I don't
think the rest of you do ...

			regards, tom lane

In response to

pgsql-docs by date

Next:From: hotzDate: 2004-07-29 01:21:41
Subject: Re: Your website
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2004-07-26 01:43:40
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] 7.5 release notes

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Christopher Kings-LynneDate: 2004-07-26 06:47:29
Subject: Re: Weird...but correct?
Previous:From: Greg StarkDate: 2004-07-26 06:12:00
Subject: Re: PG 7.4.3 optimizer choosing sequential scan. Why?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group