From:
Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To:
Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc:
Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>,
pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject:
Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Optimize commit_siblings in two ways to improve group commit.
Date:
2010-12-08 19:31:03
Message-ID:
19446.1291836663@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat )
Thread:
2010-12-08 18:51:36 from Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
2010-12-08 18:56:12 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
2010-12-08 19:25:57 from Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
2010-12-08 19:31:03 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
2010-12-08 19:35:05 from Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
2010-12-08 20:58:25 from Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
2010-12-08 21:57:33 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
2010-12-08 22:43:29 from Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Lists:
pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers
Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> Not that I see anything to disagree with in this patch, but what
> happened to posting patches in advance of committing them? Or did I
> just miss that part?
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-performance/2010-12/msg00073.php
Possibly it should have been posted to -hackers instead, but surely you
read -performance?
regards, tom lane
In response to
Responses
pgsql-hackers by date
Next :From: Robert HaasDate: 2010-12-08 19:35:05Subject : Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Optimize commit_siblings in two
ways to improve group commit.Previous :From : Robert HaasDate : 2010-12-08 19:25:57Subject : Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Optimize commit_siblings in two
ways to improve group commit.
pgsql-committers by date
Next :From: Robert HaasDate: 2010-12-08 19:35:05Subject : Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Optimize commit_siblings in two
ways to improve group commit.Previous :From : Robert HaasDate : 2010-12-08 19:25:57Subject : Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Optimize commit_siblings in two
ways to improve group commit.
