Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> writes:
> On Mon, 2010-02-01 at 20:11 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>> It'd probably be worth changing the order of the ApplySetting calls so
>> that it doesn't look suspicious.
> Just a comment would be enough I think
Yeah. Changing the order would mean that we'd do extra work applying
and then removing conflicting settings. But the general principle here
is that GUC settings coming from different places are resolved by
source priority, not order of execution.
regards, tom lane
In response to
Responses
pgsql-hackers by date
| Next: | From: Tom Lane | Date: 2010-02-02 00:09:12 |
| Subject: Re: Make TOAST_TUPLES_PER_PAGE configurable per table. |
| Previous: | From: Ivan Sergio Borgonovo | Date: 2010-02-01 23:57:21 |
| Subject: Re: development setup and libdir |