Re: [PATCHES] Fix for large file support (nonsegment mode support)

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org, Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek(dot)Kotala(at)sun(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Fix for large file support (nonsegment mode support)
Date: 2008-03-11 14:41:57
Message-ID: 19415.1205246517@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> I think this needs to be treated as experimental until it's got a few
>> more than zero miles under its belt.

> OK, then maybe we should document that.

Agreed, but at this point we don't even know what hazards we need to
document.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2008-03-11 14:48:59 Re: [PATCHES] Fix for large file support (nonsegment mode support)
Previous Message Tom Lane 2008-03-11 14:37:53 Re: LISTEN vs. two-phase commit

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2008-03-11 14:48:59 Re: [PATCHES] Fix for large file support (nonsegment mode support)
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2008-03-11 14:15:45 Re: TransactionIdIsInProgress() cache