Re: pg_dump and large files - is this a problem?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD <ZeugswetterA(at)spardat(dot)at>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Giles Lean <giles(at)nemeton(dot)com(dot)au>
Subject: Re: pg_dump and large files - is this a problem?
Date: 2002-10-31 22:07:28
Message-ID: 19403.1036102048@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> The proposed fix was to include the flex output in some other file (such
> as the corresponding grammar file) rather than to compile it separately.

Seems like a reasonable solution. Can you make that happen in the next
day or two? If not, I'll take a whack at it ...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruno Wolff III 2002-10-31 23:33:28 Re: float output precision questions
Previous Message Tom Lane 2002-10-31 21:50:02 Re: Test of PG7.3.2b2 on SGI Irix