Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: OIDs as keys

From: daniel alvarez <d-alvarez(at)gmx(dot)de>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us, neilc(at)samurai(dot)com,chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au, dev(at)archonet(dot)com,pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: OIDs as keys
Date: 2003-03-08 20:16:32
Message-ID: 19376.1047154592@www68.gmx.net (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance
> daniel alvarez <d-alvarez(at)gmx(dot)de> writes:
> >> Not ugly, but a little noisy.  However, my idea of having a single SET
> >> at the top is never going to work, so I don't have a better idea.
> 
> > Why isn't this done on a per-session basis?
> 
> Because pg_dump can't know what the session default will be when the
> dump is reloaded.  The scheme you are proposing will only succeed in
> making pg_dump unreliable.

Ouch. Why is this? Doesn't it read the config because of portability
reasons?

-- 
+++ GMX - Mail, Messaging & more  http://www.gmx.net +++
Bitte l├Ącheln! Fotogalerie online mit GMX ohne eigene Homepage!


In response to

Responses

pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2003-03-10 16:05:21
Subject: Re: OIDs as keys
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2003-03-08 20:09:15
Subject: Re: OIDs as keys

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group