Quick Links

Re: Backend-internal SPI operations

From:	Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To:	"Mark Hollomon" <mhh(at)nortelnetworks(dot)com>
Cc:	Jan Wieck <janwieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject:	Re: Backend-internal SPI operations
Date:	2000-08-30 14:20:43
Message-ID:	19348.967645243@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views:	Raw Message \| Whole Thread \| Download mbox \| Resend email
Thread:
Lists:	pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

>> The right way IMHO would be to give views another relkind.

> This appeals to me.

I like it too. Aside from the advantages Jan mentioned, we could also
refrain from creating an underlying file for a view, which would be
nice to avoid cluttering the database directory.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Re: Backend-internal SPI operations at 2000-08-30 12:31:10 from Mark Hollomon

Responses

Re: Backend-internal SPI operations at 2000-08-30 14:45:29 from Mark Hollomon
Re: Backend-internal SPI operations at 2000-08-30 15:42:47 from Jan Wieck
Re: New relkind for views at 2000-08-30 18:29:56 from Mark Hollomon

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

	From	Date	Subject
Next Message	Mark Hollomon	2000-08-30 14:45:29	Re: Backend-internal SPI operations
Previous Message	Mark Hollomon	2000-08-30 12:31:10	Re: Backend-internal SPI operations

Browse pgsql-patches by date

	From	Date	Subject
Next Message	Mark Hollomon	2000-08-30 14:45:29	Re: Backend-internal SPI operations
Previous Message	Mark Hollomon	2000-08-30 12:31:10	Re: Backend-internal SPI operations