| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Matthew Kirkwood <matthew(at)hairy(dot)beasts(dot)org> |
| Cc: | pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: A patch for xlog.c |
| Date: | 2001-02-25 04:10:43 |
| Message-ID: | 19343.983074243@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Matthew Kirkwood <matthew(at)hairy(dot)beasts(dot)org> writes:
>> Diffs posted to pgsql-patches are generally considered to be requests
>> for application of a patch. If this is only an experiment it had best
>> be clearly labeled as such.
> OK. Is there are better place for discussion of such?
pgsql-hackers is the place to discuss anything that's experimental or
otherwise concerned with future development.
> [ possible merits of mmap ]
Let's take up that discussion in pghackers.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-02-25 04:25:56 | Re: A patch for xlog.c |
| Previous Message | Nathan Myers | 2001-02-25 01:21:38 | Re: CommitDelay performance improvement |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-02-25 04:25:56 | Re: A patch for xlog.c |
| Previous Message | Matthew Kirkwood | 2001-02-24 23:45:31 | Re: A patch for xlog.c |