Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: A patch for xlog.c

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Matthew Kirkwood <matthew(at)hairy(dot)beasts(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: A patch for xlog.c
Date: 2001-02-25 04:10:43
Message-ID: 19343.983074243@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-patches
Matthew Kirkwood <matthew(at)hairy(dot)beasts(dot)org> writes:
>> Diffs posted to pgsql-patches are generally considered to be requests
>> for application of a patch.  If this is only an experiment it had best
>> be clearly labeled as such.

> OK.  Is there are better place for discussion of such?

pgsql-hackers is the place to discuss anything that's experimental or
otherwise concerned with future development.

> [ possible merits of mmap ]

Let's take up that discussion in pghackers.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2001-02-25 04:25:56
Subject: Re: A patch for xlog.c
Previous:From: Nathan MyersDate: 2001-02-25 01:21:38
Subject: Re: CommitDelay performance improvement

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2001-02-25 04:25:56
Subject: Re: A patch for xlog.c
Previous:From: Matthew KirkwoodDate: 2001-02-24 23:45:31
Subject: Re: A patch for xlog.c

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group