| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Mark Wong <markw(at)osdl(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql(at)mohawksoft(dot)com, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: 8.0.X and the ARC patent |
| Date: | 2005-03-01 22:17:07 |
| Message-ID: | 1931.1109715427@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Mark Wong <markw(at)osdl(dot)org> writes:
> On Tue, Mar 01, 2005 at 04:57:11PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Curious. The immediate question is "does it ever flatten out, and
>> if so at what TPM rate compared to 8.0.1?" Could you run the same
>> test for a longer duration?
> The comparison was against 8.0.1, or did you mean 8.0.1 with the 2Q
> patch? I can run a longer duration and see how it looks.
My point was that unpatched 8.0.1 seems to have a pretty level TPM
rate. If the patched version levels out at something not far below
that, I'll be satisfied. If it continues to degrade then I won't be
satisfied ... but the test stops short of telling what will happen.
If you could run it for 2 hours then we'd probably know enough.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Nicolai Tufar | 2005-03-01 22:26:37 | Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] snprintf causes regression |
| Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2005-03-01 22:15:39 | logging as inserts |