Chris Bitmead <chris(at)bitmead(dot)com> writes:
>> You should realize, however, that all that backend-PQexec code is dead
>> code and has been for a long time.
> Why is it dead code? Why is it no longer necessary?
It's dead code because it's not called from anywhere.
Once upon a time it was intended to be called by dynamically-loaded
C functions, but the SPI interface superseded it a long time ago.
The only reason for not ripping it out is the faint possibility that
somewhere out there is someone with hoary old C-function code that
still does queries via the backend-PQexec interface instead of SPI.
But considering that backend-PQexec has been undocumented at least
since Berkeley days, I rather doubt it.
regards, tom lane
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
| Next: | From: Chris Bitmead | Date: 2000-07-03 14:47:49 |
| Subject: Re: Backend Question |
| Previous: | From: Sevo Stille | Date: 2000-07-03 14:41:02 |
| Subject: Re: Re: postgres - development of inet/cidr |