dblink vs SQL/MED

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: dblink vs SQL/MED
Date: 2008-12-20 17:33:17
Message-ID: 19199.1229794397@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Peter wrote:
> SQL/MED catalog manipulation facilities
>
> This doesn't do any remote or external things yet, but it gives modules
> like plproxy and dblink a standardized and future-proof system for
> managing their connection information.

It seems this is a pile of pretty useless code, so far as the core
distribution is concerned, unless somebody fixes dblink to use it.
Is that on anyone's radar for 8.4?

regards, tom lane

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joe Conway 2008-12-20 18:53:45 Re: dblink vs SQL/MED
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2008-12-20 17:32:41 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Append major version number and for libraries soname major