Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: minimal update

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Gurjeet Singh <singh(dot)gurjeet(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Glaesemann <grzm(at)seespotcode(dot)net>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: minimal update
Date: 2008-10-21 13:40:56
Message-ID: 19167.1224596456@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> writes:
> In that case, why not put the trigger in core so people can use it  
> easily?

One advantage of making it a contrib module is that discussing how/when
to use it would fit more easily into the structure of the
documentation.  There is no place in our docs that a "standard trigger"
would fit without seeming like a wart; but a contrib module can document
itself pretty much however it wants.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Michael MeskesDate: 2008-10-21 13:48:38
Subject: Re: automatic parser generation for ecpg
Previous:From: Merlin MoncureDate: 2008-10-21 13:39:09
Subject: Re: minimal update

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group