Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org> writes:
> Question to all: Any objection to postfix? If so, why?
Well, I suggested DTF_FOO by analogy to the DTK_FOO name set that appears
elsewhere in that same header. If you want to rename those to FOO_DTK
in parallel, I have no objection.
> IGNORE_TOK - How about "IGNORE_DTF" or "IGNORE_D"? Let's make it a bit
> specific to date/time stuff.
Agreed. That thought was what motivated me to gripe in the first place.
regards, tom lane
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Ron Snyder||Date: 2002-05-31 21:44:54|
|Subject: Can't import large objects in most recent cvs (20020531 -- approx 1pm PDT)|
|Previous:||From: Christopher Kings-Lynne||Date: 2002-05-31 17:21:05|
|Subject: Re: Small changes to facilitate Win32 port|