| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, andrew5(at)ece(dot)cmu(dot)edu, PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [BUGS] BUG #2171: Differences compiling plpgsql in |
| Date: | 2006-02-02 21:41:01 |
| Message-ID: | 19109.1138916461@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-interfaces pgsql-patches |
Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> As a matter of curiosity, why does ecpg handle dollar quoting like that?
> psql, for example, happily just passes a dollar quoted string through to
> the backend, without any need to convert it to a conventionally quoted
> string.
Doesn't ecpg have to convert string literals into C string constants?
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2006-02-02 21:45:06 | Re: [BUGS] BUG #2171: Differences compiling plpgsql in |
| Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2006-02-02 18:36:41 | Re: [BUGS] BUG #2171: Differences compiling plpgsql in |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2006-02-02 21:45:06 | Re: [BUGS] BUG #2171: Differences compiling plpgsql in |
| Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2006-02-02 18:36:41 | Re: [BUGS] BUG #2171: Differences compiling plpgsql in |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2006-02-02 21:45:06 | Re: [BUGS] BUG #2171: Differences compiling plpgsql in |
| Previous Message | Martijn van Oosterhout | 2006-02-02 19:16:30 | Re: Multiple logical databases |