Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [BUGS] grant/revoke bug with delete/update

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Jerome ALET <alet(at)unice(dot)fr>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [BUGS] grant/revoke bug with delete/update
Date: 2000-03-07 06:51:32
Message-ID: 19050.952411892@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugspgsql-hackers
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> Bruce Momjian writes:
>> Looks very nice, but we can't apply it during beta.  Only bug fixes, and
>> this looks a little tricky.  We can try it for 7.1.  Maybe you can get
>> us a 7.0 based patch.

> It was me that encouraged him to send in this patch now because Karel and
> I are currently talking about redoing the ACL stuff for 7.1.

> I considered this a bug and the fix looks pretty straightforward. Perhaps
> it should go into 7.0.1?

It looked to me like a definition change that hadn't been adequately
discussed.  We tend to be especially leery of those during beta;
rushing in a "bug fix" that may prove to have been a bad idea is
not productive.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2000-03-07 06:55:21
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Version 7.0 beta problem
Previous:From: yutaka tanidaDate: 2000-03-07 05:25:22
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] xlog.c.patch for cygwin port.

pgsql-bugs by date

Next:From: Jerome ALETDate: 2000-03-07 10:05:46
Subject: Re: [BUGS] grant/revoke bug with delete/update
Previous:From: Kardos, Dr. AndreasDate: 2000-03-06 17:06:10
Subject: Re: [BUGS] pg_dumpall

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group