Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> Bruce Momjian writes:
>> Looks very nice, but we can't apply it during beta. Only bug fixes, and
>> this looks a little tricky. We can try it for 7.1. Maybe you can get
>> us a 7.0 based patch.
> It was me that encouraged him to send in this patch now because Karel and
> I are currently talking about redoing the ACL stuff for 7.1.
> I considered this a bug and the fix looks pretty straightforward. Perhaps
> it should go into 7.0.1?
It looked to me like a definition change that hadn't been adequately
discussed. We tend to be especially leery of those during beta;
rushing in a "bug fix" that may prove to have been a bad idea is
regards, tom lane
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2000-03-07 06:55:21|
|Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Version 7.0 beta problem |
|Previous:||From: yutaka tanida||Date: 2000-03-07 05:25:22|
|Subject: Re: [HACKERS] xlog.c.patch for cygwin port.|
pgsql-bugs by date
|Next:||From: Jerome ALET||Date: 2000-03-07 10:05:46|
|Subject: Re: [BUGS] grant/revoke bug with delete/update |
|Previous:||From: Kardos, Dr. Andreas||Date: 2000-03-06 17:06:10|
|Subject: Re: [BUGS] pg_dumpall|