Re: GIN vs. statistics collector

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Andreas Seltenreich <andreas+pg(at)gate450(dot)dyndns(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: GIN vs. statistics collector
Date: 2006-08-03 15:22:58
Message-ID: 19021.1154618578@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Andreas Seltenreich <andreas+pg(at)gate450(dot)dyndns(dot)org> writes:
> I think there's a call to pgstat_count_index_scan missing in GIN.
> Currently, the idx_scan column of pg_stat_*_indexes is stuck at zero
> for GIN indexes.
> Patch attached.

Looks correct to me --- applied.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2006-08-03 15:36:22 Re: ecpg test suite
Previous Message Joachim Wieland 2006-08-03 15:22:41 Re: ecpg test suite

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Glaesemann 2006-08-03 15:56:20 Re: Values list-of-targetlists patch for comments (was Re: [PATCHES]
Previous Message Tom Lane 2006-08-03 14:58:10 Re: Values list-of-targetlists patch for comments (was Re: [PATCHES]