Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Replication timeout units

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Replication timeout units
Date: 2011-12-20 15:34:29
Message-ID: 19016.1324395269@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> writes:
> from postgresql.conf.sample:
> #replication_timeout = 60s	# in milliseconds; 0 disables

> Seconds or milliseconds? I would suggest we just remove the "in
> milliseconds", and instead say "timeout for replication connections; 0
> disables".

That would take away any information about whether it could be set at
sub-second resolution.  I don't like the current wording either, but
just removing the "in milliseconds" seems wrong.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Peter GeogheganDate: 2011-12-20 15:53:32
Subject: Re: Replication timeout units
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2011-12-20 15:32:40
Subject: Re: sync_seqscans in postgresql.conf

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group