Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [DOCS] 8.2.0 pdf

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org, Jim Nasby <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>, Devrim GUNDUZ <devrim(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su>, "pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [DOCS] 8.2.0 pdf
Date: 2006-12-09 17:57:40
Message-ID: 18994.1165687060@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docspgsql-patchespgsql-www
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> Jim Nasby wrote:
>> Also, if PDF indexes depend on HTML, perhaps HTML should be a
>> dependency of PDF in the Makefile.

> By that logic, HTML should also depend on HTML.  I don't know how people 
> would like that.

The real point is that the "jade" step needs to be done twice to have
up-to-date indexes.  It makes sense not to force that for html, because
we use html for proofing.  But perhaps we ought to run jade twice in the
Makefile rule for producing pdftex output?  I see that the Makefile
forces three runs of TeX for similar reasons (which is probably way more
time than the jade part anyway).

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-docs by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2006-12-09 18:18:46
Subject: Re: Switching to XML
Previous:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2006-12-09 11:01:01
Subject: Re: [DOCS] 8.2.0 pdf

pgsql-www by date

Next:From: Devrim GUNDUZDate: 2006-12-10 16:44:04
Subject: Re: 8.2.0 pdf
Previous:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2006-12-09 11:01:01
Subject: Re: [DOCS] 8.2.0 pdf

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Simon RiggsDate: 2006-12-10 12:57:01
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Configuring BLCKSZ and XLOGSEGSZ (in 8.3)
Previous:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2006-12-09 11:01:01
Subject: Re: [DOCS] 8.2.0 pdf

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group