Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: pg_ctl

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers-win32 <pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_ctl
Date: 2004-03-24 16:15:08
Message-ID: 18982.1080144908@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers-win32
Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> Are we now in a state where it would make sense to look at doing pg_ctl 
> in C?

Why bother?  I should think that Windows users want to run PG as a service.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

  • Re: pg_ctl at 2004-03-24 15:54:02 from Andrew Dunstan

Responses

  • Re: pg_ctl at 2004-03-24 16:39:23 from Andrew Dunstan
  • Re: pg_ctl at 2004-03-24 20:14:22 from David Garamond

pgsql-hackers-win32 by date

Next:From: Andrew DunstanDate: 2004-03-24 16:39:23
Subject: Re: pg_ctl
Previous:From: Andrew DunstanDate: 2004-03-24 15:54:02
Subject: Re: pg_ctl

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group