Re: more i18n/l10n issues

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl>, Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: more i18n/l10n issues
Date: 2003-09-30 13:46:52
Message-ID: 18954.1064929612@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> [ some fair points ]

I've asked the Red Hat folks who did the detail design to respond to
this. I'm not sure if they had specific use-cases in mind for those
behaviors, or were just trying to make the feature useful for manual
invocation. I would think the GUI tool doesn't need most of those
behaviors, but can't swear to it.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2003-09-30 13:49:40 Re: ADD FOREIGN KEY (was Re: [GENERAL] 7.4Beta)
Previous Message Patrick Welche 2003-09-30 13:13:31 Re: ecpg doesn't compile (datetime.h/dtime_t)