| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Gurjeet Singh <singh(dot)gurjeet(at)gmail(dot)com>, PGSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Confusing message in log file |
| Date: | 2008-06-30 23:33:15 |
| Message-ID: | 18847.1214868795@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> In any case, this seems a case of stuffing too much in the primary
> message.
Yeah, good point.
> I think it should be something like
> errmsg("parameter \"shared_buffer\" change in configuration file ignored"),
> errdetail("This parameter cannot be changed after server start.")
Seems a bit awkwardly phrased. I propose
errmsg("attempted change to parameter \"shared_buffer\" ignored"),
errdetail("This parameter cannot be changed after server start.")
(or possibly "of" would read better than "to")
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2008-06-30 23:45:35 | Re: Does anything dump per-database config settings? (was Re: ALTER DATABASE vs pg_dump) |
| Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2008-06-30 23:29:03 | Re: odd output in restore mode |