| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Hiroshi Inoue" <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp> |
| Cc: | "Bruce Momjian" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Jan Wieck" <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>, "Bruce Momjian" <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, "PostgreSQL-development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>, "Ross J(dot) Reedstrom" <reedstrm(at)rice(dot)edu> |
| Subject: | Re: Big 7.1 open items |
| Date: | 2000-06-17 16:11:18 |
| Message-ID: | 18821.961258278@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
"Hiroshi Inoue" <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp> writes:
> However it seems very natural to take multi_tables_per_file
> smgr into account when we consider TABLESPACE concept.
> Because TABLESPACE is an encapsulation,it should have
> a possibility to handle multi_tables_per_file smgr IMHO.
OK, I see: you're just saying that the tablespace stuff should be
designed in such a way that it would work with a non-file-per-table
smgr. Agreed, that'd be a good check of a clean design, and someday
we might need it...
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2000-06-17 16:24:56 | Re: OK, OK, Hiroshi's right: use a seperately-generated filename |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2000-06-17 14:18:51 | Another PostgreSQL article |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kaare Rasmussen | 2000-06-17 16:32:06 | RE: Big 7.1 open items |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2000-06-17 13:02:44 | Re: odbc patches |