Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> writes:
> Attached is a revised patch: all the regression tests patch, and I'm not
> aware of any major remaining issues. Barring any objections, I'll apply
> this tomorrow.
I object ... this is still trying to enforce tupdesc refcounting on much
more of the system than I think useful or prudent.
I'll try to come up with an alternative patch.
regards, tom lane
In response to
pgsql-patches by date
|Next:||From: Neil Conway||Date: 2006-01-22 18:50:25|
|Subject: Re: TupleDesc refcounting|
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2006-01-22 18:26:23|
|Subject: Re: Allow an alias for the target table in UPDATE/DELETE |