| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org, Oleg Lebedev <oleg(dot)lebedev(at)waterford(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [GENERAL] dblink: rollback transaction |
| Date: | 2004-02-24 06:27:02 |
| Message-ID: | 18745.1077604022@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-patches |
Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> writes:
> I like the idea in general, but maybe instead there should be a new
> overloaded version of the existing function names that accepts an
> additional bool argument. Without the argument, behavior would be as it
> is now; with it, you could specify the old or new behavior.
Um, maybe I'm confused about the context, but aren't we talking about C
function names here? No overloading is possible in C ...
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2004-02-24 06:44:15 | Re: Create Schema functionality question |
| Previous Message | Seamus Thomas Carroll | 2004-02-24 06:24:51 | Re: Create Schema functionality question |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joe Conway | 2004-02-24 06:57:38 | Re: [GENERAL] dblink: rollback transaction |
| Previous Message | Joe Conway | 2004-02-24 06:19:13 | Re: [GENERAL] dblink: rollback transaction |