Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] Function to kill backend

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>,Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>,Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>,PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Function to kill backend
Date: 2004-07-26 04:36:13
Message-ID: 18734.1090816573@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches
Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
> Can we keep the cancel query function and just lose the kill one?

That would be my druthers.  I have no problem with the cancel function.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2004-07-26 05:16:00
Subject: Re: pgxs: build infrastructure for extensions v4
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2004-07-26 03:52:38
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Function to kill backend

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group