"Jeff Janes" <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> This seems to be a bug introduced by:
> I believe the source of the bug is the addition to that file of
> + if (proc != NULL)
> + continue;
> The sense of this test should be inverted, as it is NULLs, not non-nulls
> that need to be skipped.
Ooops, how embarrassing. Will fix, thanks for the report!
regards, tom lane
In response to
pgsql-bugs by date
|Next:||From: Mikael Krantz||Date: 2009-07-29 15:20:15|
|Subject: Re: BUG #4954: very slow query with 2 statements|
|Previous:||From: Greg Stark||Date: 2009-07-29 12:28:21|
|Subject: Re: BUG #4949: NOT IN is prohibitive slower than the rewrite for medium to large sets|