| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Magnus Naeslund(f)" <mag(at)fbab(dot)net> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Using an ALIAS in WHERE clause |
| Date: | 2002-11-29 01:58:44 |
| Message-ID: | 18709.1038535124@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
"Magnus Naeslund\(f\)" <mag(at)fbab(dot)net> writes:
> select
> ...
> extract('days' from (now() - i.created)) as days_overdue,
> ...
> where
> ...
> extract('days' from (now() - i.created)) >= 20
> Is the days_overdue calculated twice,
Yes.
> Not sure of how big of a performance win it would be, the extract thing
> shouldn't be that slow, right?
In general I think this is useless micro-optimization ;-). There are
few functions in SQL that are expensive enough that it's worth worrying
about calling them twice per row.
If you have a case where it really does matter (super-expensive
user-defined function, perhaps) you could probably do something with
the multi-level-SELECT technique I illustrated.
Years ago, someone at Berkeley did a thesis about planning in the
presence of expensive functions, and the remnants of that thesis are
still in the Postgres sources --- but it's dead code and would not be
easy to resurrect. I personally doubt it could be worth the trouble.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2002-11-29 03:06:20 | Re: Server v7.3RC2 Dies |
| Previous Message | CN | 2002-11-29 01:54:24 | Re: Server v7.3RC2 Dies |