Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [GENERAL] INSTEAD rule bug?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: DeJuan Jackson <djackson(at)speedfc(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] INSTEAD rule bug?
Date: 2003-07-21 20:01:03
Message-ID: 18691.1058817663@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugspgsql-general
DeJuan Jackson <djackson(at)speedfc(dot)com> writes:
>   Or is it simply any conditional rule using UNION/EXCEPT/INTERSECT/...?

Yeah, that's about the size of it :-(.  Note though that you could
probably work around the problem by pushing the UNION etc. down into a
sub-select:
	SELECT * FROM (SELECT ... UNION ...) foo;

At some point we could look at automatically transforming the query in
that way, but I'm not planning to worry about it now.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-bugs by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2003-07-21 20:52:41
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Backwards index scan
Previous:From: Boris FolgmannDate: 2003-07-21 19:30:45
Subject: Silent deadlock

pgsql-general by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2003-07-21 20:52:41
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Backwards index scan
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2003-07-21 19:57:33
Subject: Re: Fw: Is SQL silly as an RDBMS<->app interface?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group