| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Fuhr <mike(at)fuhr(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: another plperl bug |
| Date: | 2004-11-22 21:30:32 |
| Message-ID: | 18684.1101159032@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Michael Fuhr <mike(at)fuhr(dot)org> writes:
> Here's another test case: a function that doesn't return what it's
> supposed to return.
I was wondering about that --- the code paths that expect an array
seemed to be testing the SV type more carefully than those expecting
a hash did. Sigh.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Neil Conway | 2004-11-22 23:21:40 | Re: patch: plpgsql - access records with rec.(expr) |
| Previous Message | Gavin M. Roy | 2004-11-22 21:29:32 | Re: Beta5 now Available |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Neil Conway | 2004-11-22 23:42:38 | Re: pgcrypto: Makefile check |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2004-11-22 21:23:37 | Re: htmlhelp generation |