Re: [HACKERS] Missing array support

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, "Patches (PostgreSQL)" <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Missing array support
Date: 2003-06-29 21:24:53
Message-ID: 18603.1056921893@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> writes:
> Included in the patch, I changed SQL language functions so that they
> could be declared with and use polymorphic types.

I'm not convinced that will work ... in particular, does the parsetree
get fixed correctly when a SQL function is inlined?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hannu Krosing 2003-06-29 21:38:33 Re: [HACKERS] PlPython
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-06-29 21:18:10 Re: [HACKERS] PlPython

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joe Conway 2003-06-29 22:32:11 Re: [HACKERS] Missing array support
Previous Message Joe Conway 2003-06-29 20:04:42 Re: [HACKERS] Missing array support