Re: Re: int8 beta5 broken?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: ohp(at)pyrenet(dot)fr
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Larry Rosenman <ler(at)lerctr(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Re: int8 beta5 broken?
Date: 2001-02-28 17:04:10
Message-ID: 18599.983379850@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers

Olivier PRENANT <ohp(at)pyrenet(dot)fr> writes:
> Sorry to follow-up on my own post; int8 test passes if open-ssl is not
> used.

That's difficult to believe, because int8.c doesn't include anything
that even knows SSL exists. Larry, can you confirm this behavior?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Larry Rosenman 2001-02-28 17:12:48 RE: Re: int8 beta5 broken?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2001-02-28 16:53:55 Re: [HACKERS] int8 beta5 broken?

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Larry Rosenman 2001-02-28 17:12:48 RE: Re: int8 beta5 broken?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2001-02-28 16:53:55 Re: [HACKERS] int8 beta5 broken?