Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: contrib/xml2 regression tests vs no-libxslt build option

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: contrib/xml2 regression tests vs no-libxslt build option
Date: 2010-03-01 16:44:20
Message-ID: 18597.1267461860@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> No, it ignores it if libxml2 isn't available.  It can be built with
>> or without libxslt though.

> ugh.

> Maybe we need to set up a dummy function or two if not building with 
> xslt, like we do with the XML functions if not building with libxml.

Right, that was exactly my proposal.  The function should be there
always, but throw a run-time error if no xslt support.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Andrew DunstanDate: 2010-03-01 16:52:50
Subject: Re: Re: pgsql: add EPERM to the list of return codes to expect from opening
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2010-03-01 16:43:06
Subject: Re: Re: pgsql: add EPERM to the list of return codes to expect from opening

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group