Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> No, it ignores it if libxml2 isn't available.  It can be built with
>> or without libxslt though.

> ugh.

> Maybe we need to set up a dummy function or two if not building with 
> xslt, like we do with the XML functions if not building with libxml.

Right, that was exactly my proposal.  The function should be there
always, but throw a run-time error if no xslt support.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

• Re: contrib/xml2 regression tests vs no-libxslt build option at 2010-03-01 16:32:24 from Andrew Dunstan

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Andrew Dunstan	Date: 2010-03-01 16:52:50
	Subject: Re: Re: pgsql: add EPERM to the list of return codes to expect from opening
Previous:	From: Tom Lane	Date: 2010-03-01 16:43:06
	Subject: Re: Re: pgsql: add EPERM to the list of return codes to expect from opening