Re: Removal of temp tables

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Removal of temp tables
Date: 2001-06-14 17:51:28
Message-ID: 18571.992541088@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> I was wondering that. The old vacuum file detection patch had the sort
> files going into /pg_sorttemp and files called pid_. Your changes made
> it pg_tempfile directory and pg_temp file names. I like the older names
> that made them clear they were _not_ temp tables. Seemed you wanted
> them to have similar names for reasons I couldn't figure.

I'm not wedded to those names; if you have a better idea, let's hear it.
I changed it because I didn't like the use of the word "sort"; temp
files are not used only for sorts, but for several other things, and so
I wanted to see them called temp files not sorttemp files. But if you
want to change them so that they look even less like the logical names
of temp relations, that's OK with me.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2001-06-14 17:53:50 Re: Removal of temp tables
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2001-06-14 17:51:16 Re: What (not) to do in signal handlers

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2001-06-14 17:53:50 Re: Removal of temp tables
Previous Message Stephen Ramsey 2001-06-14 17:29:02 possible patch to increase number of hash overflow pages?