Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Open 7.3 items

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Open 7.3 items
Date: 2002-07-31 19:37:07
Message-ID: 18524.1028144227@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Yes, we need someone to benchmark both the NAMEDATALEN and FUNC_MAX_ARGS
> to prove we are not causing performance problems.  Once that is done,
> the default limits can be easily increased.  I was thinking 64 for
> NAMEDATALEN and 32 for FUNC_MAX_ARGS, effectively doubling both.

The SQL spec says NAMEDATALEN shall be 128 (or at least 128, too lazy
to look).  If we're gonna change it then I think we should really try
to go to 128.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Neil ConwayDate: 2002-07-31 19:38:38
Subject: Re: Open 7.3 items
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2002-07-31 19:30:30
Subject: Re: Open 7.3 items

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group