Re: why use -Ft or -Fc instead of the other on pg_dump?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Douglas J Hunley <doug(at)hunley(dot)homeip(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: why use -Ft or -Fc instead of the other on pg_dump?
Date: 2008-02-19 18:12:23
Message-ID: 18481.1203444743@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

Douglas J Hunley <doug(at)hunley(dot)homeip(dot)net> writes:
> I seemed to have walked into a "spirited" debate at work today, so I'm turning
> to the authorities to get it resolved. Why would one choose -Ft over -Fc (or
> vice-versa) when doing pg_dump?

I can't really imagine any reason to choose -Ft, except wanting to do
post-processing of the dump with command-line tools. -Ft's lack of
compression and limitations on component size are sufficient reasons
not to choose it without a specific need to. I think it has some
other limitations too, but those are two that I recall immediately.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Carol Walter 2008-02-19 18:47:01 Database Loading
Previous Message Douglas J Hunley 2008-02-19 17:59:55 why use -Ft or -Fc instead of the other on pg_dump?