| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Bryce Nesbitt <bryce2(at)obviously(dot)com>, Brendan Jurd <direvus(at)gmail(dot)com>, heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com |
| Subject: | Re: Proposed patch - psql wraps at window width |
| Date: | 2008-04-30 14:30:14 |
| Message-ID: | 18464.1209565814@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> This patch is blocking other work -- for instance, the PrintTable API
> and two patches that depend on it.
> Could we get the main hunks committed soon, with the policy bits
> stripped out? That way, discussion on the behavior can continue until
> we reach an agreement, and others can work on other patches.
This patch seems sufficiently controversial that "commit now" is the
very last thing that should happen to it.
I suggest committing the PrintTable stuff and not worrying about whether
that breaks the wrap patch.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tino Wildenhain | 2008-04-30 14:47:56 | Re: Protection from SQL injection |
| Previous Message | Andrew Sullivan | 2008-04-30 14:20:09 | Re: Protection from SQL injection |