From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Rick Flower <Richard(dot)Flower(at)quest(dot)com> |
Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, "'pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org'" <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Patches for AIX builds.. |
Date: | 2002-01-14 20:10:15 |
Message-ID: | 18411.1011039015@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-patches |
Rick Flower <Richard(dot)Flower(at)quest(dot)com> writes:
> As for the signed vs. unsigned chars, I only enabled that option as a
> way to cut down on the massive amount of warnings about type
> mismatches that occur in some of the build directories (odbc as a
> minimum) -- most directories are fine, but some of them elicit many
> warnings on this compiler/platform combination.
Hmm, I should think that -qchars=signed would make it *worse*. What I
see, in certain files, is lots of complaints that the code is implicitly
casting between "char *" and "unsigned char *". I don't recall any
places where we make use of "signed char".
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Rick Flower | 2002-01-14 20:15:15 | Re: Patches for AIX builds.. |
Previous Message | Rick Flower | 2002-01-14 20:01:25 | Re: Patches for AIX builds.. |