Re: psql return codes

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jim(at)nasby(dot)net>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: psql return codes
Date: 2006-12-06 19:25:46
Message-ID: 184.1165433146@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> Jim C. Nasby wrote:
>> Why should it matter if the "SELECT * FROM foo" came to
>> psql via -f or -c?

> Well, it explains exactly what Simon was seeing. I agree it is strange,
> but I was asking if Simon knew it was documented. I assume the "3" is
> used to report a different error from 'file not found' or something.

Well, the real point here is that ON_ERROR_STOP doesn't apply to
interactive input, and -c is evidently being considered to be
interactive. You could argue that either way I suppose, but seeing
that -c can only issue a single command, implementing ON_ERROR_STOP
for it seems like largely a waste of effort.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeff Davis 2006-12-06 19:37:32 8.2 bug with outer join reordering
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2006-12-06 19:15:32 Re: psql return codes