| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Call for objections: revision of keyword classification |
| Date: | 2001-11-09 02:17:17 |
| Message-ID: | 18394.1005272237@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> It would be nice if we had a more general system
> for adding keywords and having them be column label/function name
> capable. Right now I know I need to add to keyword.c but I have no idea
> if/when I need to add to the keyword list in gram.y.
*Every* new keyword should be in one of the keyword lists in gram.y.
I tried to clean up the documentation of which list does which and why
in the proposed patch --- what do you think of it?
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Thomas Lockhart | 2001-11-09 02:28:32 | Re: Call for objections: revision of keyword classification |
| Previous Message | Barry Lind | 2001-11-09 02:15:56 | Re: MD5-based passwords |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Thomas Lockhart | 2001-11-09 02:28:32 | Re: Call for objections: revision of keyword classification |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-11-09 02:05:07 | Re: Call for objections: revision of keyword classification |