Re: minor view creation weirdness

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: minor view creation weirdness
Date: 2003-10-03 13:53:22
Message-ID: 18358.1065189202@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
>>> I'd almost argue that we should change this message to an error
>>
>> I agree.

> Except that it would totally break backwards-compatibility?

Well, that's a possible problem. How many such views do you think are
out there, given the existence of the warning?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruno Wolff III 2003-10-03 13:57:49 timestamp.c is broken (probably by ecpg) in 7.4
Previous Message Michael Brusser 2003-10-03 13:40:50 Using backslash in query