Re: lock contention on parallel COPY ?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: lock contention on parallel COPY ?
Date: 2008-09-26 16:15:57
Message-ID: 18332.1222445757@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> I suppose Andrew didn't yet put in the hack to avoid WAL logging

> Yes I did. That's what the --truncate-before-load switch does (or should
> do).

Well, it doesn't seem to be having any effect. Maybe Stefan is testing
a configuration with xlog archiving enabled?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stefan Kaltenbrunner 2008-09-26 16:27:36 Re: lock contention on parallel COPY ?
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2008-09-26 16:13:44 Re: lock contention on parallel COPY ?