Re: Feature Matrix

From: Jim Nasby <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>
To: Mike Ellsworth <younicycle(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "Stefan Kaltenbrunner" <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Feature Matrix
Date: 2007-07-20 18:35:28
Message-ID: 182ADBE9-74DA-4841-B4B1-B4D2A319B403@decibel.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

On Jul 20, 2007, at 12:02 PM, Mike Ellsworth wrote:
> You're being to hard on yourself. :-) Simple can be good,
> especially given the vast amount of content that is already on the
> site, docs, etc. You could always reference changelogs, docs, down
> the road.
> For now, building towards 8.3, I think it is excellent as is (after
> proofreading) .... particularly for new visitors to the site.

Yeah, I think the guiding principle for the feature matrix needs to
be KISS. Only stuff that's end-user visible, fairly significant
performance improvements, or just large patches should be listed.
--
Jim Nasby jim(at)nasby(dot)net
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com 512.569.9461 (cell)

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jim Nasby 2007-07-20 18:37:27 Re: What's new in 8.3
Previous Message Jim Nasby 2007-07-20 18:32:34 Re: [PERFORM] 8.2 -> 8.3 performance numbers