| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Theo Schlossnagle <jesus(at)omniti(dot)com>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org, josh(dot)berkus(at)sun(dot)com, robert(dot)lor(at)sun(dot)com |
| Subject: | Re: BUG #2401: spinlocks not available on amd64 |
| Date: | 2006-04-20 14:38:36 |
| Message-ID: | 18284.1145543916@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-patches |
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> OK, this is a great help. If you think it should be just one file we
> can do that, but since the are separate instructions sets, separate
> files I think still makes sense.
There is no reason for the i386 or AMD64 code to be different from what's
already tested on Linux --- the hardware's the same and the OS surely
doesn't make a difference at this level.
Does Solaris' assembler really support C-style "#if defined()"
constructs in .s files? That seems moderately unlikely.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Theo Schlossnagle | 2006-04-20 15:02:32 | Re: BUG #2401: spinlocks not available on amd64 |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2006-04-20 11:09:38 | Re: BUG #2400: 'Ã' considered invalid UTF-8 character |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Theo Schlossnagle | 2006-04-20 15:02:32 | Re: BUG #2401: spinlocks not available on amd64 |
| Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2006-04-20 13:37:11 | Re: Win32 semaphore patch |