Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Vacuum goes worse

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Scott Marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Stéphane Schildknecht <stephane(dot)schildknecht(at)postgresqlfr(dot)org>, "pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Vacuum goes worse
Date: 2007-10-16 16:03:16
Message-ID: 18249.1192550596@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance
"Scott Marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On 10/16/07, St=E9phane Schildknecht
> <stephane(dot)schildknecht(at)postgresqlfr(dot)org> wrote:
>> That's also why I am so disappointed vacuum doesn't give me these 4
>> hints lines.

> What kind of error, or output, does it give you at the end?  Any hint
> as to why they're missing?

If you're talking about the FSM statistics display, that only gets
printed by a database-wide VACUUM (one that doesn't name a specific
table).

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: Brian HerlihyDate: 2007-10-17 00:03:39
Subject: Re: Vacuum goes worse
Previous:From: 李彦 Ian LiDate: 2007-10-16 16:00:57
Subject: Re: Autovacuum running out of memory

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group