Re: unknown conversion %m

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: unknown conversion %m
Date: 2011-04-28 04:44:44
Message-ID: 18196.1303965884@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> What I'm thinking of doing is to set up something like:
> #define PG_PRINTF_CHECK __printf__

BTW, gcc 2.95.3 documents "printf", and not "__printf__".
Suggest not including the underscores, since that's apparently a
johnny-come-lately spelling. It's not like any of this construct
is even faintly portable to non-gcc compilers anyway ...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dmitry Fefelov 2011-04-28 05:05:26 Re: Fail to search in array, produced by subquery - is it a bug?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2011-04-28 04:30:16 Re: unknown conversion %m