From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Paesold <mpaesold(at)gmx(dot)at> |
Cc: | Michael Glaesemann <grzm(at)myrealbox(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Interval aggregate regression failure (expected seems |
Date: | 2005-11-07 14:31:46 |
Message-ID: | 18183.1131373906@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Michael Paesold <mpaesold(at)gmx(dot)at> writes:
> I have tested these combination of CFLAGS:
> -O2 OK
> -O2 -mcpu=i686 -march=i686 OK (good, RPMS are built with these)
> -O2 -mcpu=pentium4 -march=i686 OK
> -O2 -mcpu=pentium4 -march=pentium4 fails
> I am definatly not going to use -march=pentium4 in any production
> system. Should I open a bug report with RedHat (gcc vendor)?
Yeah, but they'll probably want a smaller test case than "Postgres fails
its regression tests" :-(
My guess is that the problem is misoptimization of the interval_div()
function (look in utils/adt/timestamp.c), and that you could probably
construct a nice small test case for them out of that function.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2005-11-07 14:37:49 | Re: Getting table name/tuple from OID |
Previous Message | Tino Wildenhain | 2005-11-07 14:03:02 | Re: Getting table name/tuple from OID |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Neil Conway | 2005-11-07 16:21:17 | Re: return can contains any row or record functions |
Previous Message | Pavel Stehule | 2005-11-07 13:58:16 | return can contains any row or record functions |